Logesh v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving illegal possession of river sand. The court imposed conditions including a deposit to an advocate association, execution of sureties, and regular reporting to police.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail on executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, directed to deposit Rs.3,000 with the Registered Advocate Clerks' Association, and report to police.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
Crl.O.P.No. 651 of 2022
Logesh ... Petitioner
Versus
The State; Represented by; The Inspector of Police, Padalam Police Station, Chengalpet District. (Crime No.115 of 2021) ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest pending investigation in Crime No. 115 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban
For Respondent : Mr.A. Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case alleging illegal possession of river sand.
What conditions must be imposed on the petitioner to grant anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Logesh
- respondent
The State
Coram
T.V. Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court