Dismissed

M.Gomathy v. State Rep by

Madras HC9 Nov 2022CRL MP/16312/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking condonation of delay for filing a Criminal Revision Petition was filed by the petitioner against a dismissal order. The petitioner's counsel moved to withdraw the petition, and the court directed the Special Judge to proceed with the underlying case.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Special Judge directed to proceed with the case without delay.

M.Gomathy Vs State Rep by — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Crl.M.P.No.16312 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.sr42353 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.11.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

Crl.M.P.No.16312 of 2022

¶7

in Crl.R.C.No.sr42353 of 2022

¶8

M.Gomathy, F/A-52, W/o.G.Durai, No.1/146, Post Office Lane, Thuraipakkam, Chennai 600 097.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

State, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, City Special Union III Detachment, Alandur, Chennai 16.

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

PRAYER : This Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., r/w Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the Criminal Revision Petition against the order dated 01.12.2021 in Crl.MP.No.482 of 2021 in C.C.No.4/2021 passed by the learned Special Judge of the Special

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

Crl.M.P.No.16312 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.sr42353 of 2022

¶17

Court for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act at Chennai.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.Abinesh Babu

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the Criminal Revision Petition against the order dated 01.12.2021 in Crl.MP.No.482 of 2021 in C.C.No.4/2021 passed by the learned Special Judge of the Special Court for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act at Chennai.

¶22

2.Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave of this Court to

¶23

withdraw this Petition.

¶24

3.This Petition has been filed with regard to condoning the delay in

¶25

filing the Revision Petition, against the dismissal of Crl.MP.No.482 of 2021 in C.C.No.4/2021 on 01.12.2021. This Court permitted the learned counsel

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.M.P.No.16312 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.sr42353 of 2022

¶29

for the Petitioner to withdraw this Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.

¶30

4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the Respondent submitted that C.C.No.4/2021 posted before the Court below on 02.12.2022.

¶31

5.In view of the same, the learned Special Judge of the Special Court for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act at Chennai, is directed to proceed the case, without any further delay. Accordingly, this Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶32

09.11.2022

¶33

Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order

¶34

sai

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

Crl.M.P.No.16312 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.sr42353 of 2022

¶38

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

¶39

sai

¶40

¶41

1.The learned Special Judge Special Court for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act Chennai.

¶42

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶43

Crl.M.P.No.16312 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.sr42353 of 2022

¶44

09.11.2022

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/4

M.Gomathy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Gomathy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Vijay Home Appliances Hyd Vs M/S Universal Appliances

D.Ramesh Vs State Rep. by

Naresh Kumar Prajapat Vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise

Mr. S. Karthikeyan, Vs Mrs. M. Saranya

O.Homerlal Vs the Inspector of Police

Tmt.Kavitha Vs State Rep. by