S.M.Mariappan v. Thiruvambalam Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition for non-compliance with a writ order, the court accepted the respondents' submission that compliance was effected. Consequently, the alleged disobedience was found not wilful, and the petition was closed without a speaking order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition stands closed as compliance with prior order was established.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P(MD).No.696 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 01.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
CONT.P(MD).No.696 of 2022
S.M.Mariappan
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Thiruvambalam Pillai, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Bye Pass Road, Madurai-625 016.
2.Bama, The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Provident Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for having wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders of this Court passed in W.P(MD).No. 5343 of 2021 dated 10.03.2021 and for having committed contempt of Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.M. Mariappan
- respondent
1. Thiruvambalam Pillai
- respondent
2. Bama
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court