V. Ilango, v. Gnanasekaran, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition closed as an appeal was preferred against the impugned order. Petitioner granted liberty to file fresh petition post-appel decision.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed with liberty to file a fresh one subject to the outcome of the writ appeal.
What the court decided
CONT.P(MD).No.689 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 01.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
CONT.P(MD).No.689 of 2022
V.Ilango
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Gnansekaran, I.A.S., The Director, Animal Husbandry and Medicine, Door No.571, Anna Salai, Nandhanam, Chennai-600 035.
2.Dr.Nataraj Kumar, The Regional Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Near Gandhi Museum, Madurai-625 020.
3.Dr.Thiruvalluvan, The Assistant Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Thirumangalam, Madurai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Ilango
- respondent
1. Gnansekaran, I.A.S.
- respondent
2. Dr. Nataraj Kumar
- respondent
3. Dr. Thiruvalluvan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court