Dismissed

Latha @ Krishnavani v. Mu. Muthusamy

Madras HC29 Sept 2022CONT P(MD)/1296/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed the contempt petition filed seeking punishment for alleged wilful disobedience of an order in W.P.(MD) No.6627 of 2022, finding that the Commissioner's proceedings regarding the land survey had been initiated and communicated to the petitioner despite her objections.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed with cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to the District Siddha Medical Officer CCRI PKM.

Latha @ Krishnavani Vs Mu. Muthusamy — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD) No.1296 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 29.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

Cont.P.(MD) No.1296 of 2022

¶7

Latha @ Krishnaveni ... Petitioner /vs./

¶8

1.Muthusamy

¶9

2.P.Sasikumar ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.6627 of 2022 dated 08.04.2022.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their

¶14

wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.6627 of 2022 dated 08.04.2022.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Cont.P.(MD) No.1296 of 2022

¶18

2.Perusal of records, it is found that the petitioner has filed W.P.(MD) No. 6627 of 2022 seeking direction to the respondents therein to survey and demarcate the land in S.No.423/1B2 situated at Ottanchathiram Village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. This Court, vide order dated 08.04.2022, had disposed of the said writ petition, directing the 2^nd respondent therein to survey and fix the boundaries of the aforesaid land after giving notice to the petitioner and the rival claimants, if any, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order.

¶19

3.In compliance of the aforesaid order dated 08.04.2022, the 1^st respondent had conducted survey, in pursuance of which he has issued proceedings in Na.Ka.No.4026/22/S dated 05.09.2022, wherein it has been stated that during survey, it was found that the petitioner was not in possession of the petition mention property and the same is in possession of one Sangeetha, W/o.Viswanathan. It is also stated that the suit in O.S.No.390 of 2007, which was filed regarding share of the property, was also dismissed by the Civil Court, Ottanchathiram. Further, the petitioner has made objection to survey the said

¶20

2/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Cont.P.(MD) No.1296 of 2022

¶23

property and has also submitted the documents, which are all in her favour. All those facts were also informed to the petitioner herein, vide proceedings dated 05.07.2022 in Na.Ka.No.34/2022/S by the 1^st respondent. Even though the petitioner is having knowledge about the same, she has filed this present Contempt Petition seeking punishment to the respondents stating that they have not complied with the order of this Court dated 08.04.2022.

¶24

4.Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands dismissed with cost of Rs. 1,000/-. Hence, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs.1,000/- [Rupees One Thousand only] to the District Siddha Medical Officer CCRI PKM [A/c.No.10767823177, IFSC Code:-SBIN0000898, State Bank of India, Periyakulam Branch], within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No mm

¶26

29.09.2022

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Cont.P.(MD) No.1296 of 2022

¶30

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

¶31

¶32

Cont.P.(MD) No.1296 of 2022

¶33

29.09.2022

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

4/4

Latha @ Krishnavani v. Mu. Muthusamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Latha @ Krishnavani v. Mu. Muthusamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaliyaperumal.E Vs the Commissioner

Jeyanthi Lalitha Bai Vs The District Registrar

D.Johnson Vs M.Arvind IAS

Chennai Kammavar Trust Vs National Thermal Power Corproation Private Limited

H.Abdul Rahman Vs Thiru T.Arun Prasad

Muthalagan Vs the Senior Manager (Sp and D Wing)