H.Abdul Rahman v. Thiru T.Arun Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought contempt proceedings against the respondent for violating an order directing passport issuance. The Court found the petitioner failed to produce the mandatory birth certificate, meaning the respondent was not in default. The contempt petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed due to petitioner's failure to produce mandatory documents.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD) No.1222 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Cont.P.(MD) No.1222 of 2022
H.Abdul Rahman
... Petitioner
/vs./
T.Arun Prasad
... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against contemnor/respondent in the main writ petition for their wilful disobedience and wilful violation of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.21292 of 2021 dated 30.11.2021 and punish the respondent for the contempt committed by him.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent committed wilful disobedience of the High Court order dated 30.11.2021 by failing to issue a passport after demanding a birth certificate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
H. Abdul Rahman
- respondent
T. Arun Prasad
Coram
V. Bhavani Subbaroyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court