D.Ramajeyam v. R.Swaminathan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court closed two contempt petitions after the respondents produced orders approving the petitioners' appointments as a Water Carrier and Library Attender, directing salary payment.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petitions are closed; petitioners to comply with orders forthwith and be paid salary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)Nos.1064 and 1065 of 2019
D.Ramajeyam S.Ananthan
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
Contempt Petition(MD)Nos.1064 and 1065 of 2019
... Petitioner in Cont.P.1064/2019 ... Petitioner in Cont.P.1065/2019
vs.
1.Mr.R.Swaminathan,
The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District, Office of the District Collector Virudhunagar District.
2.Mr.Mohan
The District Educational Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District, Office of the District Collector Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents in both cases
Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to call the respondent / contemnor and punish for having wilfully disobeyed the order of the Hon'ble High Court made in W.P(MD) Nos.4596 and 4598 of 2017 dated 08.01.2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Ramajeyam S.Ananthan
- respondent
Mr.R.Swaminathan
- respondent
Mr.Mohan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court