Singamuthu v. C.Samirasu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under the Motor Vehicles Act for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent despite receiving notice, with no new counsel engaged.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
CMA(MD)No.1508 of 2008
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CMA(MD)No.1508 of 2008
Singamuthu
... Appellant/ Claimant
vs.
1.C.Samirasu
2.The Branch Manager, The New India Assurances Company Ltd., 43A Juman Centre Promannodu Cantonment Tiruchirappalli 1 ... Respondents/ Respondents
Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the fair and decreetal order dated 12.06.2008 in M.C..O.P.No.71 of 2004 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pudukottai.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Singamuthu
- respondent
C.Samirasu
- respondent
The Branch Manager, The New India Assurances Company Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court