Contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act fled for non-prosecution as the petitioner absconded from three prior hearings despite the matter being posted for dismissal. The court dismissed the petition.
The Contempt Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No. 640 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 22.04.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Cont.P.No. 640 of 2016
P.T. Sambandam ..Petitioner
Versus
Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1970/1971 to punish the respondents 1 and 2 for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the order dated 29.01.2015 in O.A.No. 651 of 2013 in C.S.No. 583 of 2013.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.A.L. Ganthimathi
ORDER
When the case was taken up for hearing on 12.03.2021, 17.02.2022,
Cont.P.No. 640 of 2016
30.03.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through his counsel. Therefore, this Contempt Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
22.04.2022
msm
Cont.P.No. 640 of 2016
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
msm
Cont.P.No. 640 of 2016
22.04.2022
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P.T. Sambandam
P.S. Jothi Selvaraj
P.S. Sathyamurthy
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
