An application was filed to delete an attachment order on immovable property. The court observed that the underlying suit was settled out of court, the respondent had no objection, and directed the Sub Registrar to delete the attachment entry.
Application allowed; Sub Registrar directed to delete the attachment entry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1767 of 2022 in C.S.No.368 of 2001
A.No.1767 of 2022 in C.S.No.368 of 2001
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.,
The present application is filed by the applicant / 1st defendant to raise the order of attachment of immovable property dated 24.03.2006 in A.No.1217 of 2005 in C.S.No.368 of 2001.
1/4
A.No.1767 of 2022 in C.S.No.368 of 2001
the Sub-Registrar to delete the entry made in the Register, the Sub Registrar advised the applicant to get necessary orders from this Court, hence this application.
“This application may be allowed, as the respondent has no objection since the money has been released”
2/4
A.No.1767 of 2022 in C.S.No.368 of 2001
Accordingly, this Application is allowed and the Sub Registrar, Velachery is hereby directed to delete the attachment, which was effected as per the order made in A.No.1217 of 2005 dated 24.03.2006.
22.04.2022
ssd
3/4
A.No.1767 of 2022 in C.S.No.368 of 2001
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
ssd
A.No.1767 of 2022 in C.S.No.368 of 2001
22.04.2022
4/4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the attachment order on immovable property should be deleted after the underlying suit is settled out of court.
Whether the Sub Registrar is directed to delete the attachment entry upon applicant's request and court application.
Bhavani Subbaroyan
Plaintiff
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
