R.Mukund v. Ramu
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged the satisfaction of a previous court order by filing a contempt petition. The respondent submitted that a patta was issued, satisfying the order. The court closed the petition based on this representation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.626 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Contempt Petition No.626 of 2022
Mr.R.Mukund ... Petitioner
Vs. Mr.Ramu The Tashildhar, Ayanavaram Taluk, Ayanavaram, Chennai – 600 023. ... Respondent
Prayer :
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondent herein for committing contempt of the order of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.7533 of 2018 dated 30.03.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thiruvengadam For Respondent : Mr.G.Krishna Raja Additional Government Pleader
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent willfully disobeyed the order dated 30.03.2021 in W.P.No.7533 of 2018
Whether the issuance of a patta in favour of the petitioner amounts to compliance with the impugned order
Whether to sustain or dismiss the contempt petition alleging disobedience
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr.R.Mukund
- respondent
Mr.Ramu The Tashildhar
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court