This is a short order in a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a prior court order. The Government Advocate stated the order was complied with, and the court closed the petition without any further reasoning or detailed discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.535 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Contempt Petition No.535 of 2013
15.N.Palanisamy ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.Mr.Mahara Booshnam The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.
1/4
Contempt Petition No.535 of 2013
2.Mr.P.Suresh
The Tahsildar, Salem District, Salem.
3.Mr.Ramachandran The Assistant Engineer, TNEB (Operation & Maintenance) Meyyanur, Pallapatti, Salem District.
... Respondents
Prayer :
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for willful, deliberate disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 22.01.2013 in
M.P.No.1 of 2012 in W.P.No.32895 of 2012.
For Petitioners : M/s.Sai For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja for R1 and R2 Government Advocate Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh for R3
O R D E R
This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the
order dated 22.01.2013 made in M.P.No.1 of 2012 in W.P.No.32895 of 2012.
2/4
Contempt Petition No.535 of 2013
24.06.2022
pri
Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/ No
3/4
Contempt Petition No.535 of 2013
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
pri
Contempt Petition No.535 of 2013
24.06.2022
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are guilty of willful disobedience of the order dated 22.01.2013.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Ponnusamy and others
Mahara Booshnam
P.Suresh
Ramachandran
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
