G. Gunasekaran v. Mr. Venkataramanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition challenging alleged willful disobedience of a previous order was dismissed as the respondent represented that the impugned order had been complied with.
Contempt petition challenging alleged willful disobedience of a previous order was dismissed as the respondent represented that the impugned order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.1010 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Contempt Petition No.1010 of 2022
G.Gunasekaran ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Venkataramanan The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. ... Respondent
Prayer :
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience of the order dated 15.07.2021 in W.P.No.14524 of 2021 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mageshkumar For Respondent : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the
order dated 15.07.2021 made in W.P.No.14524 of 2021.
1/2
Contempt Petition No.1010 of 2022
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
pri
2.It is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader
appearing for the respondent that the order dated 15.07.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.14524 of 2021, which is the subject matter of contempt was complied with.
3.In view of the above, this Contempt Petition is closed.
24.06.2022
pri
Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/ No
Contempt Petition No.1010 of 2022
24.06.2022
2/2
G.Gunasekaran
Mr.Venkataramanan The Tahsildar
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court