P.Sathyanarayanan v. J.Vijaya Rani IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Court held that the impugned order dated 08.04.2021 was complied with because the respondent had rejected the petitioner's request on 09.03.2022. Consequently, the present contempt petition stands closed.
What did the court decide?
Closed the contempt petition as the impugned order had been complied with by the rejection of the petitioner's request.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. P. No.28 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont. P.No.28 of 2022
against
W.P. No. 8714 of 2021
P.Sathyanarayanan S/o. Purushothaman Reddy, No.17C, New No.13, Thiruvalluvar Street, Race View Colony Main Road Extension, Bharathi Nagar, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.
Dr.J.Vijaya Rani, I.A.S., The District Collector, Chennai District, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. ... Respondent/2nd Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Sec.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent in the manner this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper for deliberately committing contempt by wilful disobedience of the order dated 08.04.2021 of the Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.8714 of 2021.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Sathyanarayanan
- respondent
Dr. J. Vijaya Rani
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court