Mrs.B.Sulochana v. Mrs. Valarmathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience of an earlier order. The respondent submitted a compliance report showing the order was executed. The Court closed the conviction. There is no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed without order as to costs due to compliance with the earlier order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 08.07.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 2585 of 2015
- B.Sulochana,
- B.Murugan,
- B.Jeeva,
- B.Ajitha, 5. S.Nijadhan,
- S.Ashwini .. Petitioners
- Vs -
Mrs.Valarmathi, Tahsildar, Poonamallee, Chennai-600 056 .. Respondent
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent is guilty of wilful disobedience of the order passed by the Court in W.P. No. 2309 of 2009.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Sulochana
- petitioner
B.Murugan
- petitioner
B.Jeeva
- petitioner
B.Ajitha
- petitioner
S.Nijadhan
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court