document no.66 of 1973. Subsequently, another deed of Power of Attorney dated 17.03.1973 came to be executed and the same was registered as document No. 8 of 1973, based on which, said Krishnamoorthy, acting as the power Agent, had executed the Sale Deed dated 07.08.1973 in favour of one Anthony. Subsequently, the said property was purchased by the petitioners from said Anthony vide sale deed dated 21.06.2001. After the demise of said Durai, the suit in O.S.No.8681 of 1983 came to be filed by the 7th respondent, the legal heir of said Durai, seeking to cancel the Power of Attorney executed in favour of said Krishnamoorthy and the said suit was decreed on 07.11.1985. While being so, the 7th respondent had lodged a complaint to the 3rd respondent alleging that there is no necessity for his father i.e.,Durai to execute the Power of Attorney dated 17.03.1973, when already a deed of Power of Attorney dated 30.03.1993 had been executed and that the same needs to be cancelled. Based on the said complaint, the 3rd respondent had passed the impugned order canceling the deed of Power of Attorney dated 17.03.1973 executed in favour of said Krishnamoorthy, without issuing any notice to the petitioner. Challenging the same, the present petitions have been filed.
