Y.Mohana v. K.Arumugam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition pursuant to a prior order, alleging violation by the respondent. The respondent produced a letter confirming compliance with the earlier order. The court accepted this submission and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed. No costs. Open to petitioner to challenge respondent's proceedings or agitate non-payment.
What the court decided
Cont. Petn. No.245 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Contempt Petition No.245 of 2022
Y.Mohana, No.80, Mettu Street, Venbakkam, Ozhalur 603 001, Kancheepuram District(Now Chengalpattu District) .. Petitioner
Vs.
Shri.K.Arumugam The Director Municipal Pension Payment Directorate of Local Fund Audit Integrated Office Complex for Finance Department 4th Floor, Nandanam Chennai - 600 035 .. Respondent * * *
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for having not only violated but also disobeyed the order of this court made in W.P. No.2914 of 2021 dated 11.02.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Malaichamy For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu Addl. Govt. Pleader
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Y.Mohana
- respondent
Shri.K.Arumugam
Coram
S. Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court