S.Prakasam v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court allowed a petition filed to condone a delay of 55 days in filing a Writ Appeal. The justice found the reasons satisfactory and directed the registry to number the appeal for admission.
What did the court decide?
Petition for condonation of delay allowed; Writ Appeal directed to be numbered and posted for admission.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Honble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR and The Honble Mr.Justice R.VIJAYAKUMAR CMP(MD) No.9240 of 2022 1 S.PRAKASAM S/O. LATE.CHELLAKANNU, 23G, CHEKKADI STREET, PUTTUTHOPPU, MADURAI. ... PETITIONER(S) Vs 1 THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT BOARD, CHENNAI. 2 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, MADURAI. 3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, MADURAI. 4 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARULMIGU PUTTU URCHAVA VAGAYARA KATTALAI,
PUTTUTHOPPU, MADURAI 16.
5 THE CHAIRMAN TRUSTEE / THAKK AR, ARULMIGU PUTTU URCHAVA VAGAYARA KATTALAI,
PUTTUTHOPPU,
MADURAI -16.
... RESPONDENT(S)
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 55 days in filing the Writ Appeal shall be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.PRAKASAM AND ANR
- respondent
THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT BOARD, CHENNAI AND ANS
Coram
D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court