Disposed

S.R.Ratheesh v. the Secretary

Madras HC12 Dec 2022WP(MD)/14959/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court directed the Authority to consider a gas distributor's representations for credit facility restructuring under the CGSSD scheme without adjudicating merits, setting a deadline for response.

What did the court decide?

The 5th respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 08.09.2020 and 21.09.2020 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

S.R.Ratheesh Vs the Secretary — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.12.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020 and WMP(MD)No.12591 of 2020

¶7

S.R.Ratheesh Proprietor, Adhithya Bharat Gas Petroleum, (LPG Distributor of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd) 22-76 D1, Main Road, Mettukadai, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District-629 175. ... Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

The Secretary, Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises, Room No.123, Udyog Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi-110 011.

¶10

Nodal Officer/Ombudsman, Non Banking Financial Institution, Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, Chennai-600 001.

¶11

1/81/8

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

¶14

3. The Director,

¶15

Department of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises, Chennai-6.

¶16

The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶17

5. The Authorised Officer,

¶18

M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd., Dare House, 1^st Floor, No.2 N.S.C Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai-600 001. ... Respondents

¶19

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide benefit of one time restructuring of credit facilities of petitioner with the 5^th respondent financial institution on the basis of Credit Guarantee Scheme for Subordinate Debt (CGSSD) guideline for stressed NPA Memes of the 1^st respondent dated 24.06.2020.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.C.R.Nimal For R3 & R4 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam, Government

¶21

2/82/8

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

Advocate For R5

: Mr.K.Rajeshwaran

3/83/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

¶29

ORDER

¶30

(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

¶31

The petitioner has sought for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the benefit of one time restructuring of credit facilities to him as per the guidelines issued under the Credit Guarantee Scheme for Subordinate Debit (CGSSD) for Stressed/NPA MSMES dated 24.06.2020.

¶32

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

¶33

that the Union of India framed a scheme to tide over the economic fallout due to the outbreak of Covid-19 and the Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises implemented the scheme namely, Credit Guarantee Scheme for Subordinate Debit (CGSSD) for Stressed/NPA MSMES dated 24.06.2020, for the purpose of providing

¶34

4/84/8

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

¶37

restructuring of credit facilities to the eligible borrowers for continuity of business in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. According to the learned counsel, the petitioner has complied with the requirements of eligible borrower for re-schedulement of the loan account and therefore, he sent representations to the respondents 4 and 5 on 08.09.2020 and 21.09.2020 seeking to extend him the benefit of restructuring facility under the aforesaid scheme, but the said representations did not evoke any response from the respondents. Hence, the petitioner has filed this writ petition before this Court.

¶38

Learned counsel for the 5^th respondent submitted that the petitioner's representations dated 08.09.2020 and 21.09.2020 seeking to extend the benefit of restructuring facility under the Credit Guarantee Scheme for Subordinate Debit (CGSSD) for Stressed/NPA MSMES dated 24.06.2020 will be considered and 5/85/8

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

¶41

appropriate orders will be passed on merits.

¶42

Recording the aforesaid submissions, without

¶43

going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 5^th respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 08.09.2020 and 21.09.2020 and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶44

[D.K.K.,J.] & [R.V.,J.] 12.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes bala To

¶45

The Secretary, Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises, Room No.123, Udyog Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi-110 011.

¶46

6/86/8

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

¶49

Nodal Officer/Ombudsman, Non Banking Financial Institution, Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, Chennai-600 001.

¶50

The Director, Department of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises, Chennai-6.

¶51

The District Collector, Collectorate Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶52

7/87/8

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020

¶55

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

¶56

bala

¶57

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.14959 of 2020 DATED : 12.12.2022

¶58

8/88/8

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.R.Ratheesh v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.R.Ratheesh v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anbalagan.C Vs the Union of India

M/s. Kanthan Bio Tech Vs The Authorised Officer

S.Muthu Irulappa Vaithyar Alais Muthukumar, Vs M.Lingammal Alais Soumiyasundari

Ramesh.M Vs the Authorized Officer

Charles D. Jayaseelan Vs Indian Bank

Renganathan.P Vs The Authorized Officer