Pandian v. Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a petition filed to set aside an order default-dismissing a Second Appeal. The Court found the petitioner failed to implead legal heirs of deceased respondents and failed to pay court fees for several parties.
What the court decided
CMP(MD) No.862 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.HEMALATHA
CMP(MD) No.862 of 2022
IN SA No.1795 of 1997
PANDIAN ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
Vs
- NATARAJAN
- THANGARAJ
SINGARAM (DIED) SIVALINGAM
- CHINNATHAMBI
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petition to set aside the dismissal of a Second Appeal for default should be allowed when the petitioner failed to implead legal heirs of deceased respondents.
Whether the failure to re-present returned batta for parties prevents setting aside the default dismissal order up.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pandian
- respondent
Natarajan
- respondent
Singaram
- respondent
Chinnathambi
- respondent
Kuppaiah
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court