Petitioner filed a petition for impleadment as proposed second respondent in the underlying second appeal. Petitioner's counsel moved to withdraw the petition, which was permitted.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(MD) No.11437 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.HEMALATHA
CMP(MD) No.11437 of 2016 IN SA(MD) No.121 of 2004
MUTHU NADAR ... PETITIONER/PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.2
Vs
REP BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY,
B.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
2 R.ANI @ ANIL ... RESPONDENTS 1 & 2/APPELLANTS
3 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU, REP BY DISTRITCT COLLECTOR, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. ... 3RD RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT-1
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to implead as the proposed 2nd respondent in SA(MD)No.121 of 2004.
PRAYER IN SA(MD) No.121 of 2004:
To prefer this Memorandum of Grounds of Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2004 and made in A.S.No.134/2000 on the file of Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram, reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.08.1994 and made in O.S.No.683/1983 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.T.SELVAKUMARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.S.JEYAPRIYA, Government Advocate on behalf of the 3rd Respondent, the court made the following order:-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement to that effect.
1/2
CMP(MD) No.11437 of 2016
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
08/06/2022
/ TRUE COPY /
10/06/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
1 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, PADMANABHAPURAM.
ORDER
IN
CMP(MD) No.11437 of 2016 IN SA(MD) No.121 of 2004 Date :08/06/2022
RS/PN/SAR.2 (10.06.2022) 2P-3C
2/2
MUTHU NADAR
K.PARVATHI DEVI
R.ANI @ ANIL
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU, REP BY DISTRITCT COLLECTOR, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.
R.HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
