Janardhanam v. M.Vinayagam
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a petition to condone a delay of 1009 days in representing an appeal, without naming parties. The court held that sufficient reasons were provided in the supporting affidavit and consequently condoned the delay. A final disposition is not explicitly detailed in the text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.3734 of 2022 in C.M.A.SR.No.46834 of 2019 P.T. ASHA, J,
This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 1009 days in representing the above appeal.
2.Sufficient reasons have been given in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Hence the delay is condoned.
14.03.2022
shr
1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient reasons exist to condone a delay of 1009 days in filing a petition.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court