Karunanithi v. Venkatesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Condoned delay of 114 days in filing an application against a Tribunal decree. Application allowed due to sufficient and compelling reasons stated.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 114 days in filing the application was condoned and the petition is allowed.
What the court decided
CMP No.14626 of 2021 in C.M.A.Sr.No.7010 of 2021
P.T.ASHA, J.,
This application is filed for condoning the delay of 114 days in filing the above C.M.A against the decree passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.1086 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Officer-Cum-Additional Sub Judge, Puducherry.
- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
- The Insurance Company, which was only the contesting respondent before the Tribunal, has been served, however, none entered appearance on their behalf.
- The reasons for the delay have been stated in paragraph 4 of the affidavit filed in support of this petition.
- Considering the sufficient and compelling reasons have been given, the delay is condoned and the petition is allowed.
11.03.2022
srn
1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 114 days in filing the contempt application should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Insurance Company
Coram
P. T. Asha, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court