The Holy Epiphany Church v. Rt.Rev.Dr. Devasahayam
Case brief
What is this about?
S.S.SUNDAR, J., and A.A.NAKKIRAN, J., [Order…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.22608/2022 in AS.No.842/2010
S.S.SUNDAR, J., and
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J., [Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,]
The above Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to permit the petitioner to amend the cause title of respondents 1 and 2 in the Appeal Suit.
2.Learned counsel for the
respondents has no objection for allowing this petition. However, he states that an objection is raised as to the maintainability of the suit as the suit has been laid by an unregistered Association and submitted that the present petition may be allowed without prejudice the contentions that are raised by the respondents in the main appeal.
3.The issue raised by the learned counsel in the Appeal Suit is not relevant. This petition is ordered however, without prejudice to the objections raised by the respondents with regard to the maintainability of the suit by an unregistered Association
23.12.2022
AP
Internet: Yes
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner may be permitted to amend the cause title of respondents permitting the application without ad-judication on maintainability.
Petitioner
Respondents 1 and 2
S.S.SUNDAR
A.A.NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court