In Second Appeal No. 806 of 2014, petitions seeking condonation of 552-day delay in setting aside abatement caused by the death of the sole respondent were allowed. The proposed legal representative was impleaded as the 2nd respondent.
All petitions allowed; proposed legal representative impleaded as 2nd respondent in the Second Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.Nos. 22480, 22481 & 22482 of 2017
in S.A. No. 806 of 2014
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
These petitions are filed seeking to condone the delay of 552 days in setting aside the abatement, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of sole respondent, and to bring on record the proposed 2nd respondent herein as legal representatives of deceased sole respondent.
01.08.2022
rpp
Note : The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title and post the matter on 10.08.2022.
2
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.Nos. 22480, 22481 & 22482 of 2017 in S.A. No. 806 of 2014
01.08.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay is warranted due to the death of the sole respondent during the pendency of the appeal and ignorance thereof until July 2017?
T.V. THAMILSELVI
DECEASED SOLE RESPONDENT'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
T.V. THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
