This order allowed petitions to condone a 902-day delay in seeking to set aside abatement and implead legal representatives of a deceased second respondent. The court found the delay unavoidable due to the appellant's age. Proposed representatives were impleaded.
Petitions allowed; proposed legal representatives impleaded; registry directed to amend cause title.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.Nos. 10785, 10787 & 10789 of 2022 in
S.A. No. 628 of 2013
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
These petitions are filed seeking to condone the delay of 902 days in setting aside the abatement, to set aside the abatement and to bring on record the proposed respondents 4 and 5 herein as legal representatives of deceased 2nd respondent in the above Second Appeal.
appeared and undertakes to file vakalat on behalf of proposed respondents.
2
the reasons assigned in the affidavit, all the petitions are allowed. The proposed legal representatives of the 2nd respondent are impleaded as respondents 4 and 5 in the above Second Appeal.
title.
02.08.2022
rpp
(2/2)
3
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.Nos. 10785, 10787 & 10789 of 2022 in S.A. No. 628 of 2013
02.08.2022
(2/2)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 902 days in seeking to condone abatement and implead legal representatives is condonable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner/Appellant
Respondents 3 to 5
Proposed respondents 4 and 5
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
