The single judge allowed a petition filed to permit the appellant to raise additional grounds of law in the Second appeal, framing supplementary questions regarding possession, Stage 52 applicability, and the validity of a settlement deed.
The petition was allowed; additional questions of law were framed for the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No.21142 of 2022 in S.A.No.1697 of 2001
P.T.ASHA. J,
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant. Mr.K.Goviganesan, learned counsel takes notice for respondents 2 to 9.
2 . This petition is filed seeking to permit the petitioner/appellant to raise additional grounds of appeal and substantial of law in the Second appeal.
"a) Neither the plaintiff nor his vendor ever in physical possession of the suit property i.e., Ex.A1 schedule property?.
b) Is the settlement deed dated 29.12.2006 vide document No.148 of 2007 in Book No.1 at Sub Registrar of Madurantakam is not hit by Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act?.
c) Is the above settlement deed is liable to be declared as null and void?"
20.12.2022.
07.12.2022
srn
2
3
P.T.ASHA. J,
srn
C.M.P.No.21142 of 2022 in S.A.No.1697 of 2001
07.12.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to raise additional grounds of appeal in the Second appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.T. ASHA
Respondents 2 to 9
PTASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
