A.P.Sakthivel v. v.Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge allowed petitions to implead additional parties as appellants and record legal representatives of the deceased appellant in Second Appeal, granting relief and directing registry amendments for final hearing.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to implead petitioners 1-3 as appellants 2-4 and to record respondents 5-6 as legal representatives of deceased appellant with registry directed to effect amendments.
What the court decided
C.M.P.Nos.17514/2016 & 10736 /2021 in S.A.No.1106 of 2006
C.M.P.Nos.17514 of 2016 & 10736 of 2021 in S.A.No.1106 of 2006
R. HEMALATHA, J.
These petitions are filed (i) to implead the petitioners 1 to 3 and rank them as appellants 2 to 4 (ii) to record the petitioner herein and the respondents 5 & 6 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased appellant in the above appeal, respectively.
2.The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any serious objection and this Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions. Hence, these petitions are allowed.
3.The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the Second Appeal No.1106 of 2006 and list the matter for final hearing on 19.04.2022.
17.03.2022
(2/2)
mtl
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court