A.P.Sakthivel v. v.Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed impleadment of petitioners and recorded respondents as legal representatives of deceased appellant in Second Appeal No.1105 of 2006.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to carryout amendments in Second Appeal No.1105 of 2006 and list matter for final hearing on 19.04.2022.
What the court decided
C.M.P.Nos.17513/2016 & 10738 /2021 in S.A.No.1105 of 2006
C.M.P.Nos.17513 of 2016 & 10738 of 2021 in S.A.No.1105 of 2006
R. HEMALATHA, J.
These petitions are filed (i) to implead the petitioners 1 to 3 and rank them as appellants 2 to 4 (ii) to record the petitioner herein and the respondents 5 & 6 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased appellant in the above appeal, respectively.
2.The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any serious objection and this Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions. Hence, these petitions are allowed.
3.The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the Second Appeal No.1105 of 2006 and list the matter for final hearing on 19.04.2022.
17.03.2022
(1/2)
mtl
Parties & counsel
- applicant
petitioners
- other
respondents
Coram
R. HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court