The Single Judge discharged the 1st appellant from guardianship of the 3rd appellant (Bharath Rajan) and allowed the petitions declaring the minor as major, with no objection from the second respondent.
1st appellant discharged from guardianship; 3rd appellant declared major; petitions allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P No.16195 and 16196 of 2017 in C.M.A.No.3519 of 2012
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
the 3rd appellant, namely Bharath Rajan (Minor) as major and ii) to discharge the
these two petitions.
on 09.01.2023.
21.12.2022
uma
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
uma
C.M.P Nos.16195 & 16196 of 2017
in. C.M.A No.3519 of 2012
21.12.2022
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to declare the 3rd appellant (minor) as major.
Whether to discharge the 1st appellant from guardianship of the 3rd minor appellant.
Whether the objections raised by the second respondent to the petitions.
1st appellant
Bharath Rajan
2nd respondent
A.A.NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
