The High Court recorded that legal representatives of a deceased respondent were already on record and dismissed three petitions to add further respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.1156, 1157 & 1158 of 2011
in A.S.No.437 of 1999
C.M.P.Nos.1156, 1157 & 1158 of 2011
in
A.S.No.437 of 1999
S.S. SUNDAR, J. and
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
[Order of the Court was made by S.S. SUNDAR, J. ]
The legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, namely Annamalai, in A.S.No.437 of 1999, have filed these petitions to bring
them on record as respondents in the above appeal.
2.It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions that the 1st and 2nd respondent are brothers and the 2nd respondent died unmarried leaving behind the 1st respondent and 3rd respondent as legal
heirs. The 1st respondent predeceased the 2nd respondent.
3.This Court finds that the petitioners 3 to 8 herein are already on
record as legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent in A.S.No.437 of 1999, by an order of this Court dated 11.10.2011 made in
C.M.P.No.236 of 2010 filed by the appellant.
Page 1 of 3
C.M.P.Nos.1156, 1157 & 1158 of 2011 in A.S.No.437 of 1999
S.S. SUNDAR, J. and A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
mkn
4.Recording the fact that the legal representatives of the deceased
2nd respondent are already on record as respondents 3 to 8 in A.S.No.437 of 1999, these petitions are closed.
(S.S.S.R., J.) (A.A.N., J.) 21.12.2022 (6/7)
mkn
Page 2 of 3
C.M.P.Nos.1156, 1157 & 1158 of 2011 in A.S.No.437 of 1999
C.M.P.Nos.1156, 1157 & 1158 of 2011 in A.S.No.437 of 1999
Page 3 of 3
S. S. Sundar
A. A. Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
