The Revenue Divisional Officer v. Senthil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
1076 of 2011 in A.S.No.427 of 1999…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.1074, 1075 & 1076 of 2011
in A.S.No.427 of 1999
C.M.P.Nos.1074, 1075 & 1076 of 2011
in
A.S.No.427 of 1999
S.S. SUNDAR, J. and
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
[Order of the Court was made by S.S. SUNDAR, J. ]
These petitions are filed by the appellant to condone the delay of 1843 days in filing a petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent in A.S.No.427 of 1999; to set aside the abatement; and to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent in A.S.No.427 of 1999.
2.This Court is satisfied with the reasons for the delay stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the proposed respondents/legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent themselves have filed separate petitions in C.M.P.Nos.7180 to 7182 of 2017 to bring them on record as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent in A.S.No.427 of 1999. Therefore, this Court finds that there may not be any objection from the
Page 1 of 3
C.M.P.Nos.1074, 1075 & 1076 of 2011 in A.S.No.427 of 1999
respondents.
S.S. SUNDAR, J. and A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
mkn
3.As a result, these petitions are ordered.
(S.S.S.R., J.) (A.A.N., J.) 21.12.2022 (1/7)
mkn
Page 2 of 3
C.M.P.Nos.1074, 1075 & 1076 of 2011 in A.S.No.427 of 1999
C.M.P.Nos.1074, 1075 & 1076 of 2011 in A.S.No.427 of 1999
Page 3 of 3
Appellant
Deceased 2nd Respondent's Legal Representatives
S.S. SUNDAR
A.A.NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court