The High Court condoned the significant delay in filing a Second Appeal to set aside abatement caused by the death of the first respondent, allowing the impleadment of proposed legal representatives as respondents.
Petitions allowing impeachment of legal representatives and condoning delay were allowed; cause title amended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. Nos.10735, 10736 & 10737 of 2022 in S.A.No.603 of 2013
C.M.P.Nos.10735, 10736 & 10737 of 2022
in
S.A. No. 603 of 2013
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
These petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 2367
days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 1st respondent, and to bring on record the proposed respondents 2 to 5 herein as legal representatives of deceased 1st respondent.
C.M.P. Nos.10735, 10736 & 10737 of 2022 in S.A.No.603 of 2013
proposed legal representatives of the 1st respondent are impleaded as respondents 2 to 5 in the above Second Appeal.
26.08.2022
rpp
Note :- The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title and post the matter on 13.09.2022.
C.M.P. Nos.10735, 10736 & 10737 of 2022 in S.A.No.603 of 2013
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.Nos. 10735, 10736 & 10737 of 2022 in S.A. No. 603 of 2013
18.08.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal to set aside abatement due to death of the first respondent is condonable.
Immoveable Property lessees
Deceased 1st Respondent's Legal Representatives
T.V. THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
