The High Court allowed a petition seeking condonation of a 163-day delay in representing a Cross Objection petition. The court found the reasons provided for the delay to be justifiable and posted the matter for further proceedings.
Condonation of the delay of 163 days in representing the Cross Objection petition and permission to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No. 13661 of 2022 in C.M.P. SR. No. 616 of 2021 in S.A. No. 458 of 2015
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 163 days in representing the C.M.P. SR.No.616 of 2021 for bring on legal heirs filed by the petitioner.
rpp
25.08.2022
2
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 13661 of 2022
in S.A. No. 458 of 2015
25.08.2022
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 163 days in representing the Cross Objection petition is condonable.
Whether the affidavited reasons for delay constitute justifiable grounds for condonation.
THAMILSELVI
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6
T.V. THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
