M.P. Nagarajan v. G. Kandasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for extension of time and adducing further witness was dismissed as infructuous since the underlying suit had already been disposed of.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed as infructuous. No further adjudication was required.
What the court decided
C.M.P. No. 10050 of 2022 and C.R.P.No. 1023 of 2017
C.M.P.No. 10050 of 2022 in C.R.P. No. 1023 of 2017
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed seeking to extend three more months time for disposal of the suit as per the order dated 11.02.2022 made in the above Civil Revision Petition passed by this Court.
- Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the impugned order challenged in this application to examine further witness on behalf of defendants. However, the relief claimed before the trial court was considered and the suit was disposed of. Hence, no further adjudication is required in this Civil Misc. Petition and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
3 . Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
19.09.2022
rpp
1/2
Coram
T.V.THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court