K.Dhanalakshmi v. P.Raju
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court Criminal Appeal allowed order dismissing a private complaint under Cr.P.C. 200 for non-appearance, as it was not decided on merits. Appeal directed to be restored to the Magistrate within six months.
What did the court decide?
The order dismissing the private complaint is set aside. The appeal is allowed and restored to the Magistrate to proceed and complete proceedings within six months.
What the court decided
Crl. A. No.695 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.A. No.695 of 2022
M/s.K.K.Granitile Marketing Rep. by its Proprietor Mr.Gaurav Rajmal Tated S/o.Rajmal Gomchand Tated Aged about 37 years No15/16, Devangapet Street No.2 Near Flower Market Shivan Temple Adjacent Lane Coimbatore - 641 001
Rep. by its Special Power of Attorney Holder Mr.Rajmal Gomchand Tated S/o.Gomchand Tated Aged about 60 years D.No.199-2, Ward No.47 Sukrawarpet, Coimbatore - 641 001
.. Appellant
Vs
1.M/s.N.S.R.Tiles and Granites Rep. by its Proprietor Smt.Sudha W/o.Suresh Kumar No.8/1702E, Thiru Nagar Sadhasivam Avenue P.N.Road, Near Reliance Petrol Bunk Pooluvappatti Post Tiruppur - 641 602
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of dismissal of a private complaint under Section 256 Cr.P.C. for non-appearance warrants interference on appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.K. Granitile Marketing
- respondent
N.S.R. Tiles and Granites
- respondent
Sudha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court