Karthikayan v. Gnanamani
Case brief
What is this about?
A suit for appeal filed under Section 96 of the CPC dismissing a judgment by the District Court, Karaikal was abated due to the death of the sole appellant without bringing forth legal heirs.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal Suit dismissed as abated. Connected miscellaneous petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
A.S.No.907 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
Karthikayan .. Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
Gnanamani ... Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C, to set aside the judgment and decree of District Court, Karaikal, dated 08.03.2012 made in O.S.No.25 of 2011.
The learned counsel for the appellant reports that the sole appellant died. Steps not taken to bring the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant. Hence, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as abated. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Karthikayan
- respondent
Gnanamani
Coram
Dr. Justice G.Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court