S.Duraiswamy, v. K.Rathinam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed the appeal filed by S.Duraiswamy for default, noting the absence of legal representatives of the deceased second respondent and lack of instructions from the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
A.S.No.25 of 2003
S.Duraiswamy ... Appellant/1st Defendant
vs
1.K.Rathinam 2.S.Sakunthala 3.A.Amirtham ...1 to 3 Respondents/ plaintiffs 1 to 3
4.S.Shanmughasundaram ... Respondent/2nd Defendant
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2001 made in O.S.No.169 of 1993 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Coimbatore.
For Appellants : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi
For Respondents : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Duraiswamy
- respondent
K.Rathinam
Coram
Dr. Justice G.Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court