G.Babuji v. S.Srinivasan
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment dismisses a First Appeal under Section 96 CPC as not being pressed by the learned counsel for the appellant, recording his concession without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
First Appeal dismissed as not pressed. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
A.S.No.85 of 2015
G.Babuji ..Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.S.Srinivasan
2.Kunjiraman 3.Dr.Sivakumar 4.T.Anver 5.Ramankutti 6.Abbdul Samad 7.Damodaran 8.P.Krishnan 9.P.Narayanan 10.R.Vijaya 11. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Ripon Buildings, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003. ..Respondents/Defendants
Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the issue of decree and judgment in O.S.No.9561 of 2010 on the file of VII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, and set aside the decree and judgment dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For appellant : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Babuji
- respondent
1. S. Srinivasan and others
Coram
S. Kannammal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court