A single judge order where applications were filed to substitute the wife and daughter of a deceased first appellant. The petitions were allowed to amend the record. The court also noted the withdrawal of claims against certain respondents.
Petitions allowed; registry directed to carry out amendment to add wife and daughter on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.11104 and 11105 of 2016 in A.S.No.490 of 2011
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
Pending appeal, the first appellant died and these two
applications are filed to bring the wife and daughter of the deceased first appellant on record.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the
records.
the amendment. The appellant is directed to file clean copy of the amended memorandum of grounds.
4.Learned counsel for the appellant reports that they give up
claim against the respondents 2 to 7 as unnecessary party and service to them not required.
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
1/2
VRI
Mr.Gururaj. Print the name of Mr.Gururaj, counsel for the first respondent.
A.S.No.489 of 2011.
23.02.2022
vri
C.M.P.Nos.11104 and 11105 of 2016
in A.S.No.490 of 2011
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether applications to substitute deceased appellant with his legal heirs as parties be allowed.
Deceased First Appellant's Wife and Daughter
First Respondent
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
