Single Judge order holding this Appeal Suit liable for conversion into a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, following a Division Bench precedent. Directs registry to convert and list for hearing.
Directs conversion of Appeal Suit No.1047 of 2012 into Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.S.No.1047 of 2012 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.,
This appeal suit is against the judgment and decree in L.A.O.P.No.86 of 2018, which arise out of proceedings under Section 20 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act. It is seen that the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in N.Ponnusamy and another Vs. The Special Tahsildar (Review Petition No.98 of 2016) has held that the appeal under Section 54 of The Land Acquisition Act is not maintainable and if at all only a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable and directed all the pending appeals be converted into Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and be posted before the concerned Portfolio Judge.
nsa
02.12.2022
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N.Ponnusamy and another Vs. The Special Tahsildar (Review Petition No.98 of 2016)Followed¶2
A.S.No.1047 of 2012
A.S.no.1047 of 1047 of 2012 D.B.HARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
A.S.no.1047 of 1047 of 2012 D.B.HARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Parties & counsel
