Allowed

Threpsi Solutions Private Limited v. Central Warehousing Corporation

Madras HC22 Jun 2022Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/226/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court appointed former Justice N. Kirubakaran as the sole arbitrator for a dispute between the Petitioner and Central Warehousing Corporation arising from an Authorization Agreement, avoiding adjudication on the specific plea for termination.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Kirubakaran (Retd.) as the sole arbitrator and disposal of the Arbitration Original Petition.

Threpsi Solutions Private Limited Vs Central Warehousing… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.06.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶6

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶7

M/s.Threpsi Solutions Private Limited Registered office at: 217, 2nd Floor, Jhalwar Building Patanwala compound, Near Shreyas Ghatkopar, Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400 086 Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Varun Mehta ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Central Warehousing Corporation Regional office at No.4, North Avenue, Srinagar Colony Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015 Represented by its Regional Manager

¶10

Sh.A.P.Mishra (Retd.,) Sole Arbitrator Member Engineering, Railway Board Flat No.24, 2nd Floor, ASTER-1, Vatika City, Sohna Road, Sector - 49 Gurgaon - 122 003

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

Arbitration Original Petition filed under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to terminate the mandate of the second respondent as sole Arbitrator assumed under order dated 05.05.2022

¶13

1/6

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶16

passed by the Managing Director of the 1st respondent in respect of the disputes arising out of the Authorization agreement dated 17.07.2020 between the petitioner and respondent and to direct the respondents to pay costs.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Giritharan

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.R.Thirunavukarasu for R1

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Mr.S.Giritharan, learned counsel for petitioner and

¶21

Mr.R.Thirunavukarasu, learned counsel for contesting first respondent are

¶22

before this Court.

¶23

Aforementioned 'Arbitration Original Petition' ('Arb.OP' for the

¶24

sake of brevity) has been filed inter alia under Section 14(2) of 'The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No.26 of 1996)' [hereinafter 'A

¶25

and C Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity] with a prayer for termination of mandate of second respondent.

¶26

Captioned Arb.OP is predicated on unilateral appointment of an

¶27

interested person argument. It may not be necessary to express any opinion on this argument as there is no disputation or disagreement about the

¶28

2/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶31

existence of arbitration agreement and that the arbitrable disputes have to be adjudicated upon.

¶32

Learned counsel on both sides submit in one voice that it may be desirable to have a former Hon'ble Member of the Bench of this Court to be appointed as sole Arbitrator considering the quantum of the claim and nature of the matter. This is the reason why this Court refrains itself from going into the plea on which the captioned Arb.OP is predicated. It is also made clear that this order will not be any reflection on the second respondent. It is only as a matter of good order and therefore, this order cannot be put against the second respondent in any manner. Owing to this and the nature of prayer, presence of second respondent is not imperative for disposal of captioned Arb.OP.

¶33

In the light of the narrative thus far, a short order will suffice. Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.Kirubakaran (Retd.), a former Judge of this Court, residing at No.36, 2^nd Cross Street, Rayala Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai – 600 089, Mob: 94450 25454, E-mail: [email protected], is appointed as sole Arbitrator. Hon'ble Arbitrator is requested to enter upon reference qua agreement dated 17.07.2020 captioned 'AUTHORISATION

¶34

3/6

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶37

AGREEMENT FOR USE OF STORAGE SPACE ON DEDICATED

¶38

WAREHOUSING' between the petitioner and contesting first respondent, adjudicate upon the arbitrable disputes arising therefrom and make an award by holding sittings in the 'Madras High Court Arbitration Centre under the aegis of this Court' (MHCAC) in accordance with the Madras High Court Arbitration Proceedings Rules 2017 and fee of the Hon'ble Arbitrator shall be governed by the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre (MHCAC) (Administrative Cost and Arbitrator's Fees) Rules 2017.

¶39

Captioned Arb OP is disposed of in the aforesaid manner. There

¶40

shall be no order as to costs.

22.06.2022

Index : No gpa

Note:

The Registry is directed to communicate this order forthwith to

¶45

Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.Kirubakaran (Retd.,) Former Judge of Madras High Court No.36, 2^nd Cross Street, Rayala Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai – 600 089, Mob: 94450 25454, E-mail: [email protected]

¶46

4/6

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶49

The Director Tamil Nadu Mediation Conciliation Centre -cum- Ex-Officio Member Madras High Court Arbitration Centre Chennai - 104.

¶50

5/6

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶53

M.SUNDAR.J.,

¶54

gpa

¶55

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.226 of 2022

¶56

22.06.2022

¶57

6/6

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Threpsi Solutions Private Limited v. Central Warehousing Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Threpsi Solutions Private Limited v. Central Warehousing Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amarthya Hegde Vs Anam Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

M/S. Randstad India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S.Expat Projects and Development Pvt. Ltd.

M/s.R.Sathyanarayanan, Vs M/s.Bharathi aravazhi

Mr.M.K.Dass (Deceased) Vs M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Limited

Indowind Energy Limited Vs M/s Suzlon Energy Limited

M/s.Kiara Microcredit Private Limited Vs M/s.Mahasemam Trust