Disposed

M/s.R.Sathyanarayanan, v. M/s.Bharathi aravazhi

Madras HC21 Jun 2022Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/254/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras, via a non-speaking order, disposed of an arbitration original petition by accepting the petitioners' application to withdraw the petition while preserving their rights to file a new petition with similar prayers.

What did the court decide?

Arbitration Original Petition withdrawn/closed with rights to file fresh petition preserved; no order as to costs.

M/s.R.Sathyanarayanan, Vs M/s.Bharathi aravazhi — Arbitration | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Arb O.P.(Com. Div.)No.254 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 21.06.2022

¶4

Coram

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶6

Arb O.P.(Com. Div.)No.254 of 2022

¶7

R.Sathyanarayanan

¶8

S.Purnima

¶9

M.C.Kaleeswaran

¶10

P.Gunasundary

¶11

... Petitioners

¶12

vs.

¶13

Bharathi Aravazhi

¶14

A.Prabagaran

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Prayer:

¶17

Arbitration Original Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to

¶18

(a) Appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the petitioners and respondents in terms of the partnership deed dated 01.01.2019 at Chennai;

¶19

(b) Direct the respondents to pay the costs;

¶20

For petitioners : Mr.D.Senthil Kumaar

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶22

Arb O.P.(Com. Div.)No.254 of 2022

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

After some arguments, Mr.D.Senthil Kumaar, learned counsel on

¶25

record for petitioners sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'Arbitration Original Petition' [hereinafter 'Arb OP' for the sake of convenience and clarity] but made a plea to preserve the rights of the petitioners to come up with another petition with similar/same prayer as according to learned counsel a reply dated 11.06.2022 has been received

¶26

from respondents post presentation of the captioned Arb OP.

¶27

2. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a

¶28

scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶30

Arb O.P.(Com. Div.)No.254 of 2022

¶31

3. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned Arb OP is disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit preserving all the rights of the petitioners to present another petition with same/similar prayer in this Court. There shall

¶32

be no order as to costs.

¶33

21.06.2022

¶34

Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No

¶35

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶37

Arb O.P.(Com. Div.)No.254 of 2022

¶38

M.SUNDAR. J.,

¶39

¶40

Arb O.P.(Com. Div.)No.254 of 2022

¶41

21.06.2022

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

M/s.R.Sathyanarayanan, v. M/s.Bharathi aravazhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.R.Sathyanarayanan, v. M/s.Bharathi aravazhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Gk Green Power Limited (Formerly M/s.Tcs Textiles Pvt. ltd) Vs M/S.Suzlon Global Services Ltd., Rep.by its designated representative

Mr.Sanjiv Ranjan Prasad Vs M/s.The Official Liquidator

Mrs.Shobhana Ashok Sawale Vs M/s.The Official Liquidator

Amarthya Hegde Vs Anam Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

M/S. Randstad India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S.Expat Projects and Development Pvt. Ltd.

Mr.M.K.Dass (Deceased) Vs M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Limited