The single judge allowed two applications by the fifth respondent to re-open evidence and re-call P.W.1 for cross-examination in an insolvency petition, listing the matter for trial on 15.09.2022.
Applications allowed; fifth respondent permitted to cross examine P.W.1. Matter listed for 15.09.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appln.Nos.94, 95 of 2022
Appln.Nos.94, 95 of 2022 in I.P.No.16 of 2005
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
These two applications are presented by the fifth respondent in Appln.No.342 of 2006 to re-open the evidence of P.W.1 and re-call P.W.1 for cross examination by the fifth respondent.
respondents cross examined P.W.1 but that the fifth respondent was unable to do so on the dates scheduled for such examination. He further submits that only one day is required to complete such cross examination. Learned Official Assignee has no objection to these applications being allowed.
05.09.2022
rna
1/2
Appln.Nos.94, 95 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
Appln.Nos.94, 95 of 2022 in I.P.No.16 of 2005
05.09.2022
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the fifth respondent in the Insolvency Proceedings is entitled to reopen evidence and re-call P.W.1 for cross-examination.
Fifth Respondent in Appln.No.342 of 2006
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
