The High Court Allowed the application seeking extension of time to conclude arbitral proceedings by a further six months from the date of this order.
Extension of time for conclusion of arbitral proceedings in A.F.No.31 of 2016 by six months from the date of receipt of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.3805 of 2022 in O.P.No.888 of 2015
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
This application is presented by the claimant in the arbitral proceedings seeking extension of time for conclusion thereof by a further six months.
stage of cross-examination of CW1. In the affidavit in support of this application, it is stated that proceedings could not be concluded within the prescribed time limit because parties were engaged in negotiations towards a possible amicable settlement.
liable to be allowed. Accordingly, the time for conclusion of arbitral proceedings in A.F.No.31 of 2016 is extended by a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
05.09.2022
kal
______________ Page No.1 of 2_
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
kal
A.No.3805 of 2022 in O.P.No.888 of 2015
05.09.2022
______________ Page No.2 of 2_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to extend the time limit for conclusion of arbitral proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
