Petitioner sought condonation of 121 days delay in filing review application based on recently discovered documents. Order held discovery constitutes sufficient cause, condones delay, and directs registration of review application.
Delay of 121 days in filing review application is condoned; Registry to number and list review application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.744 of 2022
A.No.744 of 2022 in O.P.No.147 of 2019
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
This application is filed to condone the delay of 121 days in filing the review application. The applicant asserts that the review application is filed on the basis of material documents which were traced recently and make out a case to review the order. The application is opposed by the respondent by relying upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in University of Delhi -vs- Union of India (2020)13 Supreme Court Cases 745, wherein the Supreme Court held that the reasons for delay should be adequately explained in the affidavit in support of the application.
the delay of 121 days in filing the review application is condoned. The
A.No.744 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
rna
Registry is directed to number and list the review application, if it is
otherwise in order.
21.03.2022
rna
A.No.744 of 2022 in O.P.No.147 of 2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 121 days in filing the review application amounts to sufficient cause for condonation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
University of Delhi vs Union of IndiaRelied on¶4
University of Delhi -vs- Union of India (2020)13 Supreme Court Cases 745
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
