The single judge allowed the applicant's application seeking leave to institute a proposed suit for permanent injunction and damages, finding that the cause of action arose partly within the jurisdiction.
Leave to institute the suit against the respondent and direction to the registry to number the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.686 of 2022
A.No.686 of 2022 in C.S.DR.(Comm.Div.) No.16866 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
In a proposed suit seeking permanent injunctive relief and
damages, the applicant seeks leave to institute the suit against the respondent before this Court. The applicant states that the disparaging advertisement has been produced in the Tamil language and is being screened in Chennai within the jurisdiction of this Court.
the application, I find that the cause of action has arisen at least partly within the jurisdiction of this Court. Accordingly, A.No.686 of 2022 is allowed by granting leave to the applicant to institute the suit against the respondent before this Court. Consequently, the Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order.
25.02.2022
rna
A.No.686 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
rna
A.No.686 of 2022 in C.S.DR.(Comm.Div.) No.16866 of 2022
25.02.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to file a suit against the respondent in this Court.
Applicant
Respondent
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
