This order allows the defendants permission to file additional documents, deeming them relevant to the defense, subject to objections regarding relevance and proof by the plaintiff.
The defendants were permitted to produce the additional documents subject to objections by the plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.230 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm. Suits)No.715 of 2015 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
This application is filed for permission to file additional documents by the defendants.
produced are relevant and material for the defence of the defendants. It is further stated that these documents could not be filed along with the written statement, and that the necessity for these documents has arisen in view of the oral evidence adduced by the plaintiff.
kal
01.03.2022
______________ Page No.1 of 3_
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
kal
n
A.No.230 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm. Suits)No.715 of 2015
01.03.2022 (½)
______________ Page No.2 of 3_
Page No.3 of 3
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
kal
n
C.S.(Comm. Div)No.50 of 2021
01.03.2022
______________ Page No.4 of 3_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the defendants are permitted to file additional documents after the written statement despite the plaintiff's objection.
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
