The High Court allowed an application for leave to exhibit additional documents regarding rental deposits in a suit trial, subject to the plaintiff's right to raise objections on admissibility and proof.
Application allowed subject to plaintiff's right to raise objections on admissibility, relevance, and proof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.5627 of 2022 in C.S.No.686 of 2019
A No.5627 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The defendants in the suit have presented the application for leave to exhibit the additional documents described in the schedule to the Judge's summons.
1/2
A No.5627 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
kal
4.Accordingly, this application is allowed subject to the right of the
plaintiff to raise objections inter alia on grounds of admissibility, relevance and proof.
14.12.2022
kal
A.No.5627 of 2022 in C.S.No.686 of 2019
(½)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave should be granted to exhibit additional documents relating to repayment of rental advances.
First Applicant
Plaintiff
SENTILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
