Single judge allowed the first defendant's application to condone a 32-day delay in filing a written statement upon satisfied sufficient cause and lack of objection from the plaintiff.
Condonation of 32-day delay in filing written statement; registry directed to receive it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.4720 of 2022
A.No.4720 of 2022 in C.S.No.100 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
This application is filed by the first defendant seeking to condone the delay of 32 days in filing the written statement. On instructions, it is stated on behalf of the plaintiff that the plaintiff has no objection to this application being allowed. On examining the affidavit and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. Consequently, the Registry is directed to receive the written statement.
19.12.2022 (2/2)
rna
1/2
A.No.4720 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
A.No.4720 of 2022 in C.S.No.100 of 2022
19.12.2022
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 32 days in filing the written statement should be condoned.
First Defendant
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
